Indicators on h4831sc load data You Should Know
Indicators on h4831sc load data You Should Know
Blog Article
I'm a true admirer in the H4831 powder. I get fantastic velocity and precision out of any caliber I have experimented with it in. Through the twenty five-06 up to your 338 it really is my head over to powder of alternative. I check out every kind of powders when working up loads, however the H4831 generally appears to appear out on prime for accuracy and velocity when the case is from the 06 class or more substantial.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain dimensions, as a result, the designation SC or limited Lower. The shorter, more compact kernels enable the powder to flow from the powder measures much more effortlessly, helping to ease the continual chopping of granules.
It truly is very likely that no even more discussion is required, wherein situation we suggest starting a new thread. If having said that you really feel your response is needed you'll be able to nevertheless do so.
Minnesota H4831SC is my go to during the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm preserving the small I've left for tumble 2021. I would start very low and operate your way up, based on what load data you examine for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
The only real variance as I realize it is that the SC was made to function through powder measures better (which it does). The for a longer period grains will not feed properly in any respect in some steps. Thats my 02 :grin:
Any load data to assist that? My first imagined is it isn't really gonna melt away many of the way and velocities will likely be gradual and everywhere. Could possibly be a good fireworks Show!
Nampa, Idaho In my knowledge the only authentic big difference is that the shortcut meters superior by means of reloading tools. As soon as it's loaded theres no purposeful change. I've listened to the shortcut may have a little little bit speedier burn fee but It appears insignificant.
Anyhow, I needed to give some 7828SC a try and cut down many of the compression. What a blunder, I could not get this powder to shoot properly or generate the velocities I get with regular 7828.
I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Immediately after months, I acquired lucky and caught some H1000 on-line not to mention paid out just a little additional. The very future 7 days in a gun display a man had a whole circumstance of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I forget about the amount of, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about h4831sc load data 3200 and it’s a moderate load.
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they have slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are superior. It bug the hell out of me. I do know greater. This is why I do not at any time throw out my more mature manuals. I do order new handbook continuously to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I take advantage of this 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ degrees with no issues.
Run your load up with the precise h4831 vs h4831sc powder (sc or standard) and lot you will be making use of though. Very same burn fee doesn't mean it can behave "precisely" the exact same. I've witnessed over 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp lots of H4831.
It is very h4831sc likely that no even further dialogue is necessary, in which case we advise starting up a different thread. If however you feel your response is required you are able to nonetheless achieve this.
A number of the old Lyman data just mentioned IMR 4831, which was surplus armed forces powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.
I sawed just one in half to discover how thick the jackets had been, plus they were simply 2 times as thick as being a fifty-grain hollow issue was. Ditto for your sixty four-grain Power Level, as these bullets are designed for deer, not prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I understand about the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I don't know everything in the slightest degree regarding the 223. I doubt that you are going to get any where with that cartridge and 4831, but let's know how it goes.